Skip to main content
DetectedProxyBrowser extension

Radar / Bet Saracen AR: Oxylabs residential proxy + Location Guard extension combo blocked ✓

RadarBetSaracen

Source. May 19, 2026 weekly sync.
Ticket. CIV-44.

What we tested

A combination attack against Bet Saracen Arkansas (Radar):

  • Oxylabs residential proxy — egress IP pointing to a residential address in Little Rock, AR.
  • Location Guard browser extension — Chrome extension reporting a spoofed Little Rock, AR location to the Geolocation API.

Both layers were aligned to the same in-state Arkansas location, to test whether browser-level spoofing on top of network-level spoofing would defeat Radar's checks.

What happened

Detected as out-of-state. The platform returned a STATE_NOT_ALLOWED error and refused the wager — despite both the IP and the browser's reported geolocation pointing to a permitted in-state address.

Why it matters

This is a genuine Radar positive — worth recording for parity. The existence of a residential-proxy signal beyond just the egress IP, or of a corroborating signal (Wi-Fi BSSID, traceroute, accelerometer, something) that survives a Location-Guard override, is meaningful.

However, this finding does not rewrite the Radar weaknesses column:

  • The Location Guard extension alone bypassed Underdog DFS on April 28 — so a Chrome extension on its own is still a known gap.
  • Proxy betting is otherwise allowed at Radar — the system has historically asked the user to "wait additional time" if another login was seen from a different location (March 31).

The May 19 positive at Bet Saracen is therefore best read as "Radar can stack a state-line check on top of network spoofing in this particular operator integration" rather than "Radar handles proxies + browser extensions in general."

Cross-reference

Radar profile → · May 19 weekly sync →

By
Julia Dolgopolova
Test lead — Competitive Intelligence